New York State Department of Labor audit findings (pages 4–5)
[1998–1999]
Item tclc-0112  https://adolfhoromero.com/archive/tclc/items/tclc-0112/

Machine-generated text (OCR) from photographs of the original pages. Not corrected; it contains errors.
The page images are the authoritative record.

===== Page 1 (Box 1 sequence page 363) =====
page 4

Our study and evaluation made for the limited purposes set forth in the first paragraph
of this report would not necessarily disclose all material weaknesses in the system nor
all deviations from prescribed compliance requirements because it was based on
selective tests of the accounting records and related data. Accordingly, we do not
express an opinion on the system of internal accounting and administrative control.

However, our study and evaluation disclosed no condition that we believe to be a
material weakness.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

te Our audit disclosed that the auditee did not correctly report expenses for several
budget lines. The amounts reported for fringe benefits and bookkeeping
expenses contained mistakes that resulted in $1,031.20 being reimbursed for
charges not incurred. The hourly rate reported for the bookkeeper was greater
than the actual rate paid; with the overreimbursement totaling $692.98. In
addition, the auditee, among other errors, included the federal and state income
tax withholdings as part of the fringe benefits expenses. The net overpayment
for this expense category was $338.32. However, there are no questioned costs
as the auditee paid for program expenses that were not reported for

reimbursement.

The auditee incurred expenses of $1,184.26 in the salaries line and other
operating expenses line that exceeded the reimbursement they received. The
reason that these expenses were not paid by the NYSDOL is that they exceed
the budget line for each of the expense categories. A budget modification would

have allowed the auditee to report the actual charges paid.

We recommend that the Midstate Central Labor Council develop procedures to
ensure the accurate reporting of the actual expenses paid on behalf of the OSH
program. In addition, they should monitor the contract's expense lines and

request the appropriate budget modifications.

Ze The contractor had no documented or specified allocation method for joint costs.

Shared direct costs incurred for a common or joint purpose benefiting both the
Midstate Central Labor Council and the UAW should be assigned or distributed

between the two benefiting organizations using an allocation method which
approximates the benefit received (i.e., square footage for office rent and
number of instruments for telephone expense) as opposed to an arbitrary or

undocumented division of joint costs.

===== Page 2 (Box 1 sequence page 362) =====
The examination of the equipment inventory disclosed that the computer
equipment purchased did not have NYSDOL inventory tags. The auditor
determined that the proper paperwork was not filed at the NYSDOL. Therefore,
the purchase was never recorded on the department's records. Subsequent to
the field work, the correct paper has been processed and inventory tags will be

issued.